Jump to Navigation

Trial and Appeal

While there is no requirement that an attorney represent you in a lawsuit, given all the procedural and evidentiary rules, a lawyer can be a great asset. If you are considering filing a lawsuit, contact a lawyer.

Business Litigation Information at Cooper Erving & Savage LLP

In Albany and Upstate New York, the law firm of Cooper Erving & Savage LLP, provides small, medium and large businesses with experienced advice, counseling and representation for a wide range of legal issues, including corporate litigation. During every legal matter, our attorneys use sound judgment and focused service to protect our clients' interests.

Our firm has practiced for nearly 200 years and our lawyers remain dedicated to achieving successful results in every case.

Learn more about general business litigation issues by reviewing the information below. Contact us at Cooper Erving & Savage LLP, by calling us toll free at 888-352-3751 to discuss your case with an experienced attorney.

Thank you for contacting Cooper Erving & Savage LLP. Your message has been sent.

Call us now

or use the form below.

At the law firm of Cooper, Erving & Savage, LLP, we are proud of the longevity that our firm has earned through dedicated trial practice and responsible legal service. Since 1813, we have helped individual and business clients resolve complex legal issues.

Our firm has extensive experience and a strong track record of success in many forms of business litigation, including cases involving employment and labor issues, real estate, bankruptcy and premises liability defense.

Trial and Appeal

For most people, trial is the most familiar stage of litigation. Yet, a relatively small percentage of cases actually reach the trial stage. A trial is the formal process of bringing a legal action before a judge or jury to obtain a judgment or verdict on the issues. This article provides an overview of the stages of a trial. If you are considering filing a lawsuit or if you have been sued and have questions about the trial process, talk to a litigation attorney at Cooper Erving & Savage LLP in Albany, New York.

Voir Dire (Jury Selection)

Voir dire, also known as jury selection, provides the judge and attorneys an opportunity to question potential jurors. Each attorney is allowed to challenge, or strike, a potential juror, but must provide a stated reason for the challenge (such as bias). In addition, a limited number of peremptory strikes are allowed for each party. Peremptory strikes allow an attorney to object to, or strike, a potential juror without providing a stated reason. The purpose of voir dire is to provide a panel of jurors who are capable of rending a fair and impartial verdict for the case. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 48 specifies that there should be between 6 and 12 jurors in federal cases, but the number of jurors may be different depending on the state or jurisdiction.

Opening Statements

Each attorney has the opportunity to present an opening statement to the jury. During the opening statement, each side provides the jury with an outline of the facts of the case. The attorneys can provide an explanation of the issues involved and the facts that they intend to prove. However, the opening statements are not considered evidence, may be presented in a persuasive manner and generally must be limited to the issues involved in the case.

Presentation of Evidence

In a civil case, the plaintiff presents evidence first. Generally, the evidence includes witness testimony, documents and other exhibits, such as photographs, charts or objects. The judge, who uses the rules of evidence for the jurisdiction in which the case is heard, initially decides whether evidence is allowed (admitted) during the trial. Generally, evidence will be admitted when it is relevant and not unfairly prejudicial.

Witness Testimony

There are two types of witnesses. General or lay witnesses can testify to what they directly heard or saw, and expert witnesses have a specialized knowledge in a particular field and can give opinions based on the evidence presented in the case. When a witness is called to testify, the witness is required to take an oath to tell the truth before answering questions from the attorneys. The attorney who calls the witness will question, or examine, the witness first. Then, opposing counsel may question, or cross-examine, the witness.

During the presentation of evidence, the attorneys are allowed to object, based on the rules of evidence. The judge can sustain the objection (meaning the objection is warranted) or overrule it (meaning the objection is denied). The attorneys may object to questions asked by opposing counsel and answers given by the witnesses, along with the relevancy of any other evidence presented.

Closing Arguments

When all of the evidence has been presented, the attorneys have the opportunity to clarify points and summarize the case for the jury. Similar to the opening argument, the closing argument must be limited to the issues of the case, but may be presented in a persuasive manner. The goal of closing arguments is to provide the jury with a clear picture of the evidence and why it leads to a conclusion supporting a verdict in favor of the plaintiff or defendant. At the conclusion of closing arguments, the judge will instruct the jury on the law, and then the jury leaves the courtroom to deliberate (determine the verdict).

Verdict and Judgment

When the jury has reached a verdict, all of the parties return to the courtroom for the reading of the verdict. The verdict is a final determination regarding matters of fact and can be overturned by a judge, but only when the facts of the case could not lead a reasonable person to reach the same determination as the jury.

The judgment is the court's (judge's) final determination of the responsibilities and rights of the parties in the particular case. The judgment is the court's last action in a case and must address all of the issues presented in the case. When making the final judgment, the court relies on the jury's verdict for issues relating to facts.

Appeals

Generally, the party that loses at trial may appeal the decision. Appellate review of a decision may be used to correct errors committed by the trial court, develop the law, achieve a uniform approach to certain issues across courts and pursue justice. In the federal court system, appeals are governed by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. State courts generally have their own rules regarding appellate procedure. Generally, the appealing party (called the appellant) will file a brief that outlines the arguments and facts in support of its position and the appellee (the party who won in the lower court) will file a responsive brief arguing why the decision should be upheld. Depending on the jurisdiction, the parties may have an opportunity for oral argument.

Representation by a lawyer is recommended when going to trial; however, it is not required. A person can represent himself or herself, which is called appearing pro se. If you are considering filing a lawsuit, a litigation attorney at Cooper Erving & Savage LLP in Albany, New York can represent you throughout trial.

Copyright ©2009 FindLaw, a Thomson Business

DISCLAIMER: This site and any information contained herein are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek competent legal counsel for advice on any legal matter.

Back to Main

Site Navigation Contact Us

Cooper Erving & Savage LLP
39 North Pearl Street, Fourth Floor
Albany, NY 12207
Phone: 518-618-4082
Toll Free: 888-352-3751
Fax: 518-432-3111
Map and Directions

Clifton Park office
1520 Crescent Road, Ste 300
Clifton Park, NY 12065
Phone: 518-618-4082
Toll Free: 888-352-3751
Map and Directions

Cooper Erving & Savage LLP is Rated "Av" By Martindale-Hubbell *

*AV ®, BV ® and CV ® are registered certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the Bar and the Judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings fall into two categories - legal ability and general ethical standards.